Dr. Johnny Briseno, Principal, Rancho Isabella Elementary, Angleton ISD
Dr. Johnny Briseno is the principal of Rancho Isabella Elementary School in the Angleton Independent School District. His discussion of the students on his campus covered both the data-driven paper trail of information derived from the endless reports and statistics produced from standardized test results as well as qualitative data that focuses on the environment and needs of his students.
Dr. Briseno’s approach to problems on his campus is to first address where the problem is coming from. He states that he and his teachers look at all of the facts, not just the numbers and statistics from test scores. He asks that his teachers answer questions such as, “Why wasn’t this student successful? Has something happened at home? What things are going on in this child’s environment that might affect his success at school?”
He feels that these questions must be answered in the event that he or his staff is required to intervene on the student’s behalf. Student identity is important to Dr. Briseno, and it is evident from his interview that he cares a great deal about the students as individuals and not just that their test scores are high.
One example of action research on his campus is in the areas of staff development and teacher motivation. When teachers are successful in their classroom, he encourages them to share their methods and strategies with their peers during faculty meetings or professional development sessions. This provides a win-win situation for all of his teachers. It allows the teacher who is proud of his/her classroom achievements to share these successes with others. The other teachers benefit from these presentations because they are learning what works on their campus and will be able to implement these strategies in their own classrooms.
Of the three video interviews, I enjoyed Dr. Briseno’s the most. He appears to be a very caring administrator, both about his teachers as well as his students. He is not so focused on test scores that he forgets about the children on his campus. He realizes they are individuals and have needs and requirements that must be met in order to assist them in their achievements.
Dr. Timothy Chargois, Director of Research, Planning and Development in Beaumont ISD
Dr. Timothy Chargois is the Director of Research, Planning and Development in the Beaumont Independent School District. The main idea of his discussion was that his district must be data driven and that teachers today must work under the pressures of improving student performance. Dr. Chargois’s approach to education appears to be solely data driven and that student achievement scores must improve. He states that universities that prepare teachers for classrooms must teach them not only in pedagogy and content, but also how to use the data to improve their teaching skills.
Projects or research topics presented to his district for consideration must assist Beaumont ISD in improving student performance. He mentions several projects, all of which require the teacher to learn how to manipulate data in order to raise student achievement scores. One in particular that he talks about is a project funded by the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation where district personnel learn to use programs to analyze data from today (the present) in order to prepare for tomorrow (the future). It seems evident though that Dr. Chargois may need to consider the students behind these achievement scores. He goes on to state that new projects that his district are considering will only be allowed to be conducted after testing is completed for the year.
While I realize that data is an important part of planning for a district’s needs, Dr. Chargois’s viewpoints appear to be very much in favor of data driven campuses that are concerned only for improvement in test scores. I was appalled to hear his comments towards the end of his online interview:
“The old adage ‘If I just touch one kid, I’ve done what …’ No sir, that doesn’t work under today’s accountability. Unfortunately, it’s good to have those good feelings about ‘I made this kid feel good’ and all that, but come May or August those results have to show, ‘Hey, we got this kid to improve.’ … Today’s teacher has to realize those pressures in terms of accountability. … We work under this umbrella that we have to produce results. We have to increase student performance.”
Dr. Chargois’s interview was in direct contrast to that of Dr. Johnny Briseno with the Angleton ISD. Where Dr. Briseno appears to be a very caring administrator and one that is concerned about his students’ personal successes as well as their scores, Dr. Chargois appears to be concerned only with test scores and that everything his district does should be to ensure that the scores improve. I sincerely hope that this is not indicative of the majority of administrators in public education today.
Chargios, T., 2010. EDLD 5301 Action Research Study Online Interview. Lamar University.